Meta-analysis: Statistical Trickery or Sound Science?

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

Online First

Zahra Sohani

Citation Information : Sohani Z. Meta-analysis: Statistical Trickery or Sound Science?. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012; 46 (1):12-14.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1004

Published Online: 01-09-2013

How to cite this article

Sohani Z. Meta-analysis: Statistical Trickery or Sound Science? J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012; 46(1):12-14.

PDF Share

Understanding the systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Arcg Dis Child 2005;90:845-48.
Publication bias. The Cochrane collaboration. Retrieved from: http://www.cochrane-net.org/openlearning/html/mod15-3.htm 2002.
Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:376-80.
Principles and procedures BMJ 1997;315:1533-37.
Utilizing existing databases. In: Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB (ed). Designing Clinical Research. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer 2007;207-11.
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323:42-46.
The preferred method of choice for the assessment of distance learning quality factors. The international review of research in open and distance learning. Meta-analysis 2008;9(3):1-15.
Special designs: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In Karlsson J, Marx RG, Nakamura N, Bhandari M. (Ed). A Practical Guide to Research: Design, Execution, and Publication. New York: Elsevier 2011;39-45.
(2009). What is meta-analysis? Retrieved from http://www.adipofat.com/adipofat/docs/Meta-Analysis.pdf
Pooling research results: Benefits and limitations of meta-analysis. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1999;25(9):462-69.

PDF Share