Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Education and Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 46 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Qualitative Assessment of Research done at Two Premier Medical Institutes in India: Some Data for Introspection

KLN Rao, Ravi Prakash Kanojia, Kirti Kumar Rathod

Citation Information : Rao K, Kanojia RP, Rathod KK. Qualitative Assessment of Research done at Two Premier Medical Institutes in India: Some Data for Introspection. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012; 46 (1):24-33.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1007

Published Online: 00-03-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To perform a qualitative assessment of research publications coming from two premier medical institutes in India.

Materials and methods

Research publications from AIIMS and PGIMER published during 2004 to 2008 were analyzed. The publications were categorized into five types. A year-wise analysis was done for both the institutes. Data was obtained from Scopus. The collected data included the number of papers published in a category, total citations received by a type of publication in a year, number of publications which have no citations, number of publications with only one citation, h-index, number of zero and only one citation were added to get publications with negligible citations.

Results

A total number of 4,828 and 2,882 research publications were analyzed from AIIMS and PGIMER respectively. The original articles attracted highest no of citations that is 64 and 66% of the total citations in a year for AIIMS and PGIMER respectively. Approximately 37 to 42% of the original articles get negligible citations. The h-index for various categories of article was higher for the original articles (18/13), whereas it was very low for other category of research publications.

Conclusion

The original articles fetch more citations in long run. Close to 40% of the original research done in the studied institutes get negligible citations pointing toward their outcome utility and quality. More than 60% of the minor category publications remain uncited. This sort of data if periodically obtained should serve as a benchmark for quality analysis of scientific research.

How to cite this article

Kanojia RP, Rathod KK, Rao KLN. Qualitative Assessment of Research done at Two Premier Medical Institutes in India: Some Data for Introspection. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012;46(1):24-33.


PDF Share
  1. Bibliometric analysis of the Korean Journal of Parasitology: Measured from SCI, Pub Med, Scopus and Synapse databases. Korean J Parasitol 2009;47:S155-67.
  2. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/home.url [updated 2010 Jan; cited 2010 Feb 2010].
  3. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 14:47, February 4, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=H-indexandoldid=341862546, 4 Feb 2010.
  4. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS 2005:102:16569-72.
  5. Measure for measure in science. Science 1993;260:884-86.
  6. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 2004;430:311-16.
  7. Improved citation status of world journal gastroenterology in 2004: Analysis of all reference citations by WJG and citations of WJG articles by other SCI journals during 1998-2004. World J Gastroenterol 2005:7;1-6.
  8. Bibliometric analysis of the Spanish MR radiological production (2001-2007). Eur J Radiol 2008;67:384-91.
  9. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 2009:302;1092-96.
  10. Comparison of Pub Med, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 2008;22:338-42.
  11. Scopus Web site. http://www.scopus.com . Accessed Dec 7, 2009
  12. (2010, January 30). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 15:24, February 4, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Web_of_Scienceandoldid=340977246
  13. (2009, November 2). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 15:23, February 4, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_Citation_Indexandoldid=323406312
  14. (2010, January 29). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 15:25, February 4, 2010, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PubMedandoldid=340641837
  15. Google Scholar beta Web site. http://scholar.google.com . Accessed December 7, 2009.
  16. Google Scholar: The new generation of citation indexes. LIBRI 2005;55:170-80.
  17. Beyond citation analysis: A model for assessment of research impact. J Med Libr Assoc 2010;98:17-23.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.