Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Education and Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 48 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Technique for Closed Interlocking Nailing of Midshaft Tibial Fractures without Image Intensification

Manoj Mathew, Harinder Gakhar

Citation Information : Mathew M, Gakhar H. A Technique for Closed Interlocking Nailing of Midshaft Tibial Fractures without Image Intensification. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2014; 48 (3):111-116.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1114

Published Online: 00-09-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

In this study, we evaluated the reliability, reproducibility and final outcome of our techniques for performing image independent tibial interlocking nailing.

Design

Prospective.

Setting

Tertiary teaching hospital (level I trauma center).

Patients/participants

A total of 29 patients were selected for the study (21 males and 8 females patients).

Intervention

Locked tibial intramedullary nailings were performed in the selected subjects, using the standard AO interlocking nail (SynthesTM, Switzerland), utilizing our improvisations of the standard technique.

Main outcome measurements

The successful completion of the technique was the prime parameter evaluated. Total surgical time, time taken for placement of each distal bolt, fluoroscopy time (when used) and postoperative alignment and reduction were evaluated. The patients were followed at 4 weekly intervals.

Results

The average duration of the surgery was 78.6 minutes. The mean distal locking time was 16.2 ± 1.4 minutes. Fluoroscopy had to be used in three cases, when the distal locking by the ‘nail-over-nail’ technique failed. In one case, the intra-medullary position of the guidewire had to be verified. Thus, 26 out of 30 (86.7%) cases were performed without any imaging assistance. In two cases, the fracture site had to be opened after difficulties were encountered in achieving closed reduction. Thus, 24 out of 30 procedures (80%) were successfully completed by our technique. The fractures were followed to union and the long-term results were comparable to the results of tibial fracture operated by image assistance.

Conclusion

The technique described here can come handy in situations of image intensifier failure. Routine use of part of the steps can assist in reducing radiation exposure during interlocking nailings.

How to cite this article

Mathew M, Dhillon MS, Gakhar H. A Technique for Closed Interlocking Nailing of Midshaft Tibial Fractures without Image Intensification. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2014;48(3):111-116.


PDF Share
  1. Occupational radiation exposure to the surgeon. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13(1):69-76.
  2. A new mechanical aiming device for the placement of distal interlocking screws in femoral nails. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117(3):147-152.
  3. The AO distal locking aiming device: an evaluation of efficacy and learning curve. Injury 2001;32(9):713-718.
  4. Intramedullary locked nailing of femur and tibia: insertion of distal locking screws without image intensifier. Injury 1997;28(4):323-326.
  5. An image intensifier laser guidance system for the distal locking of an intramedullary nail. Injury 1991;22(4):339.
  6. Interlocking intramedullary nails: an improved method of screw placement combining image intensification and laser light. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;281:199-203.
  7. Precise robot-assisted guide positioning for distal locking of intramedullary nails. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24(5):624-635.
  8. Next generation distal locking for intramedullary nails using an electromagnetic X-ray-radiation-free realtime navigation system. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73(1): 243-248.
  9. Radiation-free distal locking of intramedullary nails: evaluation of a new electromagnetic computer-assisted guidance system. Injury 2013;44(6):872-875.
  10. Treatment of closed tibial fractures. Instr Course Lect 2003;52:607-622.
  11. Tibial intramedullary nail distal interlocking screw placement: comparison of the free-hand vs distally-based targeting device techniques. Injury 2001;32:SD21-SD25.
  12. Locking nailing: an aid to distal targetting. Injury 1989;20(3):129-130.
  13. Fluoroscopic guidance vs surgical navigation for distal locking of intramedullary implants. A prospective, controlled clinical study. Injury 2004;35(6):567-574.
  14. Interlocking medullary nails-radiation doses in distal targeting. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987;106(3): 179-181.
  15. Radiation exposure to surgeon and patient in intramedullary nailing of the lower limb. Injury 2002; 33(8):723-727.
  16. Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: How far away is far enough? J Orthop Trauma 1997;11(6):392-398.
  17. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A(4):580-585.
  18. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma 1997;11(1):10-13.
  19. A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14(3):187-193.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.