Addition/deletion/modification of prespecified outcomes makes clinical trial results untrustworthy. Tackling this outcome reporting bias remains a challenge in spite of the advent of clinical trials.
Ioannidis J, Caplan AL, Dal-Ré R. Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters. BMJ 2017 Feb 14;356:j408.
Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009 Sep;302(9):977-984.
Jones CW, Keil LG, Holland WC, Caughey MC, Platts- Mills TF. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. BMC Med 2015 Nov;13:282.
Dal-Ré R, Caplan AL. Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014 Apr;70(4):491-493.
Goldacre B, Drysdale H, Powell-Smith A, Dale A, Milosevic I, Slade E, Hartley P, Marston C, Mahtani K, Heneghan C. The COMPare project. Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials. [cited 2017 Feb 25]. Available from: http://comparetrials.org/.
