Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Education and Research

Register      Login

VOLUME 52 , ISSUE 2 ( April-June, 2018 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Reporting of Outcomes in Clinical Trials

Nusrat Shafiq, Samir Malhotra

Keywords : Clinical trials, Journal, Outcome reporting

Citation Information : Shafiq N, Malhotra S. Reporting of Outcomes in Clinical Trials. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2018; 52 (2):62-63.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1277

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2018

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Addition/deletion/modification of prespecified outcomes makes clinical trial results untrustworthy. Tackling this outcome reporting bias remains a challenge in spite of the advent of clinical trials.


PDF Share
  1. Ioannidis J, Caplan AL, Dal-Ré R. Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters. BMJ 2017 Feb 14;356:j408.
  2. Mathieu S, Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Ravaud P. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2009 Sep;302(9):977-984.
  3. Jones CW, Keil LG, Holland WC, Caughey MC, Platts- Mills TF. Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. BMC Med 2015 Nov;13:282.
  4. Dal-Ré R, Caplan AL. Time to ensure that clinical trial appropriate results are actually published. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2014 Apr;70(4):491-493.
  5. Goldacre B, Drysdale H, Powell-Smith A, Dale A, Milosevic I, Slade E, Hartley P, Marston C, Mahtani K, Heneghan C. The COMPare project. Tracking switched outcomes in clinical trials. [cited 2017 Feb 25]. Available from: http://comparetrials.org/.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.