RESEARCH ARTICLE |
https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1606 |
Beliefs, Concerns, and Issues toward COVID-19 Vaccination amongst the Adult Population: A North Indian Study
1-3,5,8Department of National Institute of Nursing Education (NINE), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
4Department of Nursing, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
6Department of Biochemistry, AIIMS, Vijaypur, Jammu and Kashmir, India
7Ex Senior Medical Officer, Government Multi Specialty Hospital (GMSH), Chandigarh, India
9,10Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
Corresponding Author: Sushma K Saini, Department of National Institute of Nursing Education (NINE), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, Phone: +91 9888038248, e-mail: sushmadrsaini@gmail.com
Received on: 03 September 2021; Accepted on: 05 January 2022; Published on: 31 December 2022
ABSTRACT
Background: A great apprehension persists regarding the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination amongst the public, and there is a need to explore the same to intervene accordingly.
Objective: To explore the beliefs, concerns, and issues toward COVID-19 vaccination amongst the general public in the Northern region of India.
Materials and methods: Using a convenient sampling technique, adults were enrolled in the study. Online survey pro forma comprising information profile, beliefs, concerns, and issues related to the COVID-19 vaccine was developed and validated. The ethical clearance was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee. The participants were provided with an online link on WhatsApp to fill out the survey pro forma with the consent form affixed to it. The self-reported data was analyzed by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.
Results: Around 60% of subjects had faith in science and vaccine. When asked about the final state of mind about vaccinating themselves and their family members, more than one-third of the participants (43.7) could not decide. Nearly 42% were willing to get vaccinated, whereas 15% denied taking the vaccine. Factors associated with the decision to take the vaccination were sex (male), place of stay (rural area), socioeconomic status (upper), and religion (Hindu).
Conclusion: Participants of the study had major concerns regarding the safety of the vaccination, probable severe complications related to it, and apprehension about the affordability of treatment in private hospitals in case of possible adverse reactions to the vaccine. Hence, it is recommended to pay special emphasis to information and education regarding the safety and efficacy of the vaccine.
How to cite this article: Kaur S, Kalyan G, Saini SK, et al. Beliefs, Concerns, and Issues toward COVID-19 Vaccination amongst the Adult Population: A North Indian Study. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2022;56(4):165-170.
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: Dr Sukhpal Kaur is associated as the National Editorial Board Member of this journal and this manuscript was subjected to this journal’s standard review procedures, with this peer review handled independently of the Editor-in-Chief and his/her research group.
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019, Expression of concern, Safety, Vaccination, Vaccine efficacy.
INTRODUCTION
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has drastically impacted our daily lives. According to recent data released by the Health Ministry, 1,29,14,146 Indians have been diagnosed with COVID-19 viral infection, and 1,66,832 individuals have lost their lives due to corona complications, though 1,18,44,755 people have recovered from the infection.1 University of Oxford and Astra Zeneca ended the long gruesome waiting period for vaccination against this deadly virus and developed the vaccines covishield and covaxin. Around the globe, the biggest coronavirus vaccination program started on 16 January 2021.2-4 The first phase started with vaccination on priority to the healthcare workers and frontline workers related to the field of education and police, etc.2 This was followed up with the second phase which included citizens above 60 years and those above 45 years with comorbidities.3 Recent data suggests that a total of 8,79,59,72 vaccine doses have been administered, including 7,74,56,701 individuals being given both doses while 1,05,03,020 have received a single dose till now.5 This may be because of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs). As one of the study reported 46% out of 1036 participants who received ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine experienced one or more minor AEFIs such as pain, tenderness, redness, etc. at the injection site within 24 hours of administration of vaccine.6
Apart from the three important measures, including hand hygiene, social distancing, and wearing a face mask, inoculation is another very important and safe method to protect oneself from this deadly virus. Though many people are somewhat keen to get vaccinated, a vast majority still have concerns regarding its efficacy. The negative attitude of people regarding vaccination is the main public health concern, and hence educating, motivating, and convincing people to get themselves vaccinated is another important challenge. It is imperative to understand the reasons why people refrain from getting vaccinated. A Russian survey elucidated the whys and wherefores of the denial of vaccination among the study population. A wide variety of explanations were given by the participants of the survey; for instance, some perceived that there was no need for vaccination, some were concerned about the effectiveness of the vaccine, and even doubtful about the process of vaccination procedure and thought it was dangerous. Moreover, still, others were apprehensive about the impact of vaccination on the immune system and its consequences; also, some felt that clear information was not given about the new vaccine.7 However, another survey from the United States revealed that the acceptance rate for the COVID-19 vaccine was 67%.8 Marcec et al. reported that in Europe, only 58% of responders were willing to have the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and in this view, it was proposed that some public health educational activities regarding vaccination should be started before the availability of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine to improve attitudes of the general public.9 In another such survey, uncertainty and unwillingness regarding the COVID-19 vaccination was due to “intermediate to high levels of vaccine benefit,” unforeseen side effects, and mistrust.10
Nzaji et al. reported that 27.7% health care workers were willing to take the COVID-19 vaccine if available, and the likelihood of taking the vaccine will improve through education.11 A study on beliefs and barriers about the COVID-19 vaccination study in the general population in India found that only 13.7% had hesitancy and the rest, 86.3% willing.12
However, this aspect remained unexplored in the Northern region of India, so the current study is an attempt to explore the beliefs, concerns, and issues toward COVID-19 vaccination amongst the general public and healthcare providers from North India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A cross-sectional descriptive survey was conducted among adults living in the tricity (Chandigarh, Mohali, and Panchkula). By using convenient sampling technique, data was collected from 734 participants. An online survey pro forma comprising three parts was used to collect the data. The first part was to document the information profile regarding their age, gender, educational status, religion, and COVID-19 positivity status among participants or any of the family members, etc. The second part was a 30 items scale with the options of “strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree” with respective scores of 1–5, and not applicable to know the beliefs, concerns, and issues related to the COVID-19 vaccine. In the third part, the participants were asked to document their overall state of mind regarding getting themselves or their family members vaccinated against COVID-19. The survey pro forma was validated by experts in the field of medicine, nursing, and public health, and the content validity index was 0.82. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh. The participation was voluntary, and the participants were given the opportunity to clarify any aspect of the research. The confidentiality/anonymity of the data was maintained throughout the research process. Informed consent was taken through WhatsApp. The adult population was contacted with a convenient sampling technique. They were provided with the online link on WhatsApp to fill out the survey pro forma with the consent form affixed to it. Weekly telephonic reminders were sent to the nonresponders for 2 weeks to fill out the form. The self-reported data was coded and analyzed by using SPSS version 20.
RESULTS
The total subjects under study were 734, out of which 71% were females and 29% were males. The mean age of the subjects was 31 ± 12.8 years. More than half of the participants were between the age group of 20–40 years. Amongst all of the study subjects, one-third of the subjects (35%) were educated up to secondary level, 24% were graduates, 29% were postgraduates, whereas only 4% were doctorates in their education. More than half of the participants (58%) were unmarried, whereas the rest (41%) were married except a few (0.4%) who were separated/widows/widowers. Nearly three-fourths of the participants (72%) were Hindus, 24% were Sikhs, followed by 3% who belonged to other religions. The majority (74%) of the subjects had an urban background as compared to 26% who had rural residential background. The majority (73.3%) of the study participants had nuclear families, and more than half (58.3%) belonged to upper middle-class status and were health care providers (56.4%). Only 10.2% of the study subjects had a history of having COVID as compared to the majority (89.8%) who did not have any history of having the disease.
Findings about beliefs and concerns and issues regarding COVID vaccine are presented in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. Table 1 describes the beliefs related to the COVID-19 vaccine, and responses were categorized as agree, neutral, and disagree. More than half (53.4%) of the participants believed that everyone should take COVID-19 vaccine. Around 60% of the subjects had faith in science and vaccine, whereas 32.8% had neutral opinions. When enquired about protection by the vaccine for all strains of corona, only 27.7% did not agree with the statement, whereas 38.1% had neutral opinions. More than one-third (41.3%) believed that people >60 years and children should not be vaccinated. Nearly 70% disagreed with the statement that there is no corona and that the vaccine is just for commercial benefit. Nearly half (50%) of the subjects did not agree with the fact that natural immunity alone is good enough and the vaccine is not needed. Approximately three-fourths (73.4%) of the people agreed with the fact that social distancing, mask, and hand hygiene are best, but the vaccine is required too. Nearly 42.5% agreed that natural homemade immunity boosters (like kahra, giloye, etc.) could not replace the vaccine, whereas 38% had neutral opinions. Around 65% of the participants disagreed that corona is just like simple flu and people recover within 5–6 days, and there is no need to vaccinate. Nearly half (50.9 %) of the subjects agreed to vaccinate themselves in case anyone known around them has taken it and is healthy. Nearly 25.9% of the study subjects agreed to the vaccine (Indian/foreign) if even it is given free of cost, whereas 39.2% had a neutral opinion. Around 40% of the participants felt that the vaccine is the only way to prevent corona and that it is a must to take the vaccine, whereas one-third had a neutral opinion, and 26% disagreed.
S. No. | Variables | Strongly (S) agree/agree | Neutral | S disagree/disagree | Not applicable |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | I believe that everyone should take COVID-19/corona vaccine | 392 (53.4) |
250 (34) |
92 (12.6) |
|
2 | I believe in science and feel vaccine is safe | 435 (59.2) |
241 (32.8) |
58 (7.8) |
|
3 | I feel the vaccine will protect us from all the strains/types of corona | 273 (37.2) |
280 (38.1) |
181 (24.7) |
|
9 | I think we should not vaccinate people >60 years and children | 168 (22.9) |
263 (35.8) |
303 (41.3) |
|
13 | I feel there is no corona and this vaccine is for commercial benefit | 59 (8) |
175 (23.8) |
500 (68.1) |
|
14 | I feel natural immunity is good enough and there is no need of vaccine | 169 (23) |
222 (30.2) |
343 (46.7) |
|
15 | I feel the number of cases have reduced and nearly all are naturally immunized | 284 (38.6) |
260 (35.4) |
190 (25.8) |
|
16 | I feel herd immunity will benefit the community more than the vaccine | 308 (41.9) |
279 (38) |
147 (20) |
|
17 | I feel natural homemade immunity booster (like kadha, giloye, etc.) can’t replace vaccine | 311 (42.5) |
246 (33.5) |
177 (24.1) |
|
18 | I feel though social distancing, mask and hand hygiene is best, still the vaccine is also required | 539 (73.4) |
147 (20) |
48 (6.6) |
|
19 | I already got infection from coronavirus, so I don’t require this vaccine throughout my life | 20 (2.7) |
105 (14.3) |
288 (39.2) |
321 (43.7) |
20 | I have seen that corona is just like simple flu and people recover within 5–6 days and I feel there is no need to vaccinate | 75 (10.2) |
183 (24.9) |
476 (64.9) |
|
28 | I am ready to take any vaccine (Indian/foreign) if it is given free of cost | 190 (25.9) |
288 (39.2) |
256 (34.9) |
|
29 | I am ready to take vaccine if anyone known around me has taken it and is healthy | 374 (50.9) |
246 (33.5) |
114 (15.5) |
|
30 | I feel vaccine is the only way to prevent corona, and we have no other option, we have to take it | 294 (40) |
250 (34.0) |
190 (26) |
S. No. | Variables | S agree/agree | Neutral | S disagree/disagree | Not applicable |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4 | I am concerned about the safety of vaccine to myself and my family | 546 (74.4) |
144 (19.6) |
44 (6) |
|
5 | I have fear that the vaccine may cause severe complications | 320 (43.6) |
258 (35.1) |
156 (21.2) |
|
6 | I have fear that the vaccine can cause sudden death | 85 (11.6) |
242 (33) |
407 (55.4) |
|
7 | I am worried, I will not be treated well in government hospital in case of any adverse reaction | 240 (32.6) |
195 (26.6) |
299 (40.7) |
|
8 | I am worried, I won’t be able to afford treatment at a private hospital in case of any adverse reaction | 302 (41.1) |
221 (30.1) |
211 (28.8) |
|
10 | I don’t have faith in government plans to handle adverse reactions | 217 (29.5) |
233 (31.7) |
284 (38.6) |
|
11 | I feel the government is planning to test the vaccine on us | 223 (30.4) |
248 (33.8) |
263 (35.8) |
|
12 | I feel that the speed with which the vaccine has been prepared is a source of suspicion | 209 (28.4) |
301 (41) |
224 (30.5) |
|
21 | I will not get vaccinated because long-term side effects have not been studied | 285 (38.8) |
263 (35.8) |
186 (25.4) |
|
22 | I was ready to take vaccine, but my family member has told me not to have it as it has adverse effects | 125 (17) |
162 (22.1) |
267 (36.3) |
180 (24.5) |
23 | I have chronic problem like diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, so I don’t think I should take this vaccine | 61 (8.4) |
133 (18.1) |
246 (33.5) |
294 (40) |
24 | I am taking immune-suppressants so I will not vaccinate myself | 68 (9.3) |
128 (17.4) |
222 (30.2) |
316 (43.1) |
25 | Every day new strains of corona virus are coming up, so this vaccine won’t be effective for longer period | 307 (41.8) |
287 (39.1) |
140 (19) |
|
26 | I am ready to take vaccine because I want to get rid of this corona fear and related restrictions | 289 (39.3) |
269 (36.6) |
176 (24) |
|
27 | I think I can take vaccine made in foreign not in India | 86 (11.7) |
215 (29.3) |
433 (59) |
Various concerns and issues have been identified regarding the COVID-19 vaccine based on the responses of participants in the current study and presented in Table 2. Major concerns listed were: (1) safety of the vaccine, (2) fear that the vaccine may cause severe complications, and (3) worry about affording treatment in private hospitals in case of adverse reactions. Nearly three-fourths (74.4%) of the participants were concerned about the safety of the vaccine as compared to only 6% who disagreed, whereas 20% had a neutral response to the safety of the vaccine.
More than one-third (43.6%) of the subjects had fear that the vaccine may cause severe complications, whereas 35.1% had a neutral response and only 21.2% of subjects disagreed. More than one-third (40.7%) of the subjects disagreed that they would not be treated well in government hospitals in case of any adverse reaction and around 33% agreed, whereas 26.3% had a neutral response. More than half (55.2%) of the study subjects denied any fear that the vaccine could cause sudden death, whereas 33% had a neutral response. Around 41% were worried that they would not be able to afford treatment in private hospitals in case of any adverse vaccine reactions, as compared to 30% who had neutral responses, whereas 29% disagreed. Around 38.6% of participants had faith in government plans regarding handling adverse reactions, 31.7% had neutral responses, whereas around 30% did not have faith in government plans.
Major issues found were: (1) government planning regarding handling adverse reactions, (2) speed with which vaccine has been prepared, (3) vaccine is in the trial stage (4) long-term side-effects are not studied and, (5) ineffectiveness of vaccine for a longer period as new strains of coronavirus are emerging. Most of the subjects had neutral responses for the above reported issues.
Amongst those who had chronic problems and those taking immune-suppressants drugs, one-third (33.5%) of the subjects disagreed that persons with chronic problems like diabetes, hypertension, arthritis, and those taking immune-suppressants should not take vaccines. Nearly 42% of participants believed that this vaccine would not be effective for a longer period as new strains of coronavirus are emerging, whereas 39% had a neutral response. The final opinion of the subjects regarding COVID-19 vaccine is depicted in Figure 1.
Fig. 1: Final opinion regarding COVID-19 vaccine
When asked about the final state of mind about vaccinating themselves and family members, more than one-third (43.7) was not able to decide, and around 42% said they wanted to get vaccinated, whereas 15% denied taking the vaccine.
Table 3 reported that a significantly higher percentage of male participants (47.9%), Hindus (46.2%), participants from rural areas (43.4%), from upper socioeconomic status (54.6%), having a history of COVID (54.7%) wanted to vaccinate themselves as compared to their counterparts (p < 0.05). Age, educational status, marital status, type of family, and working in healthcare department had no impact on the decision to take the vaccine.
DISCUSSION
For years communicable diseases have been prevented by the use of vaccines and saved millions of lives. Today the world is facing the COVID-19 pandemic. To combat this pandemic, scientists all over the world have worked hard to develop a vaccine against the virus. The Government of India has approved the use of two vaccines, covishield and covaxin, and recently, a third vaccine called sputnik V was also approved. A portion of the population are keen to get this vaccination, while the other majority still have concerns regarding its efficacy. Hence a need was felt to explore the beliefs, concerns, and issues toward COVID-19 vaccination amongst the general public in the Northern region of India.
In the present study, only half (53.4%) of the respondents believed that everyone should take COVID-19 vaccine. Around 60% of subjects had faith in science and vaccine, whereas 32.8% had a neutral opinion. When enquired about protection by the vaccine for all strains of corona, 27.7% did not agree with the statement, whereas 38.1% had a neutral opinion, which indicates that people were not sure about the efficacy of the vaccine, and they still wanted to wait and watch till others took it. On the other hand, in an Italian survey on influenza vaccine, Domnich et al. reported that vaccines should be mandatory (74.8%) as these are crucial for public health.13
The vaccine is given free of charge in most countries. In the present study, 25.9% of the participants agreed to have the vaccine (Indian/foreign) if it is given free of cost, whereas 39.2% had a neutral opinion. In the survey conducted in Italy, reported by Domnich et al. in 2020 that half of the participants (53.2%) said that “they would personally pay if there was no free of charge vaccination offer.”13 Similarly in a study in Bangladesh reported that one-third (35%) of participants responded that “they would not purchase the vaccine at their own expense if it was not provided free of charge by the government.”14
People feel that vaccine is required to manage the pandemic. This is depicted in the responses of participants. Among them, three-fourths agreed with the fact that social distancing, masks, and hand hygiene are best, but the vaccine is required too. Nearly half of them were of the opinion that natural homemade immunity boosters (like kahra, giloye, etc) could not replace the vaccine. Around 65% of participants disagreed that corona is just like simple flu and people recover within 5–6 days, and there is no need to vaccinate.
Even if people were convinced that there is a need to have vaccination still, they were afraid of getting it. This was reflected in the response of half of the participants who agreed to vaccinate themselves in case anyone known around them has taken it and is healthy. They had some concerns and issues regarding vaccination. The most important concern was the safety of the vaccine, fear that the vaccine may cause severe complications, and worry about affording treatment in private hospitals in case of adverse reactions. Similar results were reported in the study of Di Gennaro et al., that the reasons why people were indecisive about taking the vaccine was because they received little (78%) or conflicting (69%) information about COVID-19 vaccines. Another reason was a lack of trust in vaccine safety (85%).15 While among respondents from the University of Malta, fear of injections was the main reason for being uncertain of taking the vaccine (82.5%, n = 275). More than half (56%) of the participants said that they required more information about the vaccine, and 50.1% did not want to be among the first to take the vaccine.16
The major issues that came to light were the speed with which the vaccine was prepared and government planning regarding handling adverse reactions. Many of them said that the vaccine is in trial stage and the long-term side effects are not studied. Nearly 42% of participants believed that this vaccine would not be effective for a longer period as new strains of coronavirus are emerging. Similar results were reported in a study in Bangladesh and showed that 26% considered that the vaccine available against COVID-19 is safe, 60% said that they would get the vaccine without hesitation, and two-thirds would motivate their friends and family members to receive the vaccine.14
When asked about the final state of mind about vaccinating themselves and family members, 43.7% were not able to decide, around 42% said they wanted to get vaccinated, whereas 15% denied taking the vaccine. It shows the uncertainty about vaccination. Different findings were reported by Di Gennaro et al. in a survey in Italy that overall, 67% of participants planned to get the vaccine, while 26% were unsure, and 7% refused it.15 Another study by Fisher et al. from the US reported that 57.6% participants (n = 571) said that they wanted to get vaccination, 31.6% (n = 313) were uncertain, and 10.8% (n = 107) did not want to get the vaccination.16 Just over half (51.0%) of the participants from the University of Malta said about their willingness to get the vaccine, 32.6% were uncertain, and 15.6% were unwilling to get the vaccine.17 Al-Qerem and Jarab among the Middle Eastern population reported that among 1,144 participants, 36.8% said “no” when asked about getting the vaccine if it was available, and 26.4% said, “not sure.” The main reasons why the participants were hesitant or refusing the vaccination were a lack of trust and apprehensions about the use of vaccines.18
The factors associated with the decision of taking vaccination were sex (male), place of stay (rural area), socioeconomic status (upper), and religion (Hindu). Further, people with a history of COVID-19 (54.7%) wanted to vaccinate themselves as compared to their counterparts. Age, educational status, marital status, type of family, and working in healthcare department had no impact on the decision to take the vaccine. While according to Fisher et al., the factors which were associated independently with hesitancy to get the vaccine (“no” or “not sure” response) involved black race, younger age, low level of education, and who have not received the influenza vaccine in the previous year.17 Another study by Cordina et al., reported that more females were unsure about getting the vaccine while males were more willing to take it (Chi-square = 14.63, df = 4, p = 0.006). Statistically different responses were from different age groups that is, 40–49 years old being more likely to state that ‘they were unsure whether to take the vaccine, and the participants 60 years and over were more likely to say that “they intended to take the vaccine” (Chi-square = 23.99, df = 10, p = 0.007).16 The study undertaken in the Middle Eastern population reported a significant negative impact of sample characteristics of participants’ intention to be vaccinated, including; being married, being female, and having postgraduate qualifications compared to university students.18
It is concluded that there was an urgent need to educate healthcare personnel regarding vaccination by involving mass media and social media so that information is spread at a faster speed. The data of the present study can help policymakers and governments to direct communication toward the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
Variables | f (%) | Not able to decide about vaccination | Don’t want to vaccinate | Want to vaccinate | X2 (df) p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (in years) | |||||
<20 20–40 >60 |
147 (20) 433 (58.9) 144 (20.9) |
66 (44.9) 202 (46.7) 53 (36.8) |
22 (15.0) 63 (14.5) 23 (16.0) |
59 (40.1) 168 (38.8) 78 (54.2) |
7.9 (4) 0.09 |
Gender | |||||
Male Female |
215 (29.3) 519 (70.7) |
78 (36.3) 243 (46.8) |
34 (15.8) 74 (14.3) |
103 (47.9) 202 (38.9) |
7.06(2) 0.03 |
Educational status | |||||
Less than secondary Diploma/graduation Postgraduation and above |
262 (38.7) 231 (31,4) 241 (32.8) |
121 (46.2) 108 (46.8) 92 (38.2) |
42 (16.0) 25 (10.8) 41 (17.0) |
99 (37.8) 98 (42.2) 108 (44.8) |
7.64 (4) 0.11 |
Marital status | |||||
Ever married Never married |
305 (41.5) 429 (58.4) |
122 (40.0) 199 (46.4) |
48 (15.7) 60 (14.0) |
135 (44.3) 170 (39.6) |
2.95(2) 0.23 |
Religion | |||||
Hindu Sikh Any other (Muslims and Christians) |
529 (72.1) 175 (23.8) 30 (4.1) |
225 (42.5) 81(46.3) 15 (50.0) |
60 (11.3) 42 (24.0) 6 (20.0) |
244 (46.2) 52 (29.7) 9 (30.0) |
25.14 (4) <0.01 |
Residence | |||||
Urban Rural |
543 (74.0) 191 (26.0) |
250 (46.1) 71 (37.2) |
71 (13.1) 37 (19.4) |
222 (40.8) 83 (43.4) |
6.57 (2) 0.04 |
Type of family | |||||
Nuclear Joint |
538 (73.3) 196 (26.7) |
239 (44.4) 82 (41.8) |
84 (15.6) 24 (12.2) |
215 (40.0) 90 (46.0) |
2.55 (2) 0.28 |
Socioeconomic status as Kuppu 2020 | |||||
Upper Upper middle Lower middle Upper lower |
130 (17.7) 428 (58.3) 102 (13.9) 74 (10.1) |
44 (33.8) 201 (47.0) 47 (46.1) 29 (39.2) |
15 (11.6) 64 (15.0) 15 (14.7) 14 (18.9) |
71 (54.6) 163 (38.0) 40 (39.2) 31 (41.9) |
12.92 (6) 0.04 |
Healthcare providers | |||||
Yes No |
414 (56.4) 320 (43.6) |
185 (44.7) 136 (42.5) |
56 (13.5) 52 (16.3) |
173 (41.8) 132 (42.3) |
1.12 0.57 |
History of having COVID in the study participants | |||||
Yes No |
75 (10.2) 659 (89.8) |
25 (33.3) 296 (44.9) |
9 (12.0) 99 (15.0) |
41 (54,7) 264 (40.1) |
5.94 (2) 0.05 |
Anybody in the family had COVID ever | |||||
Yes No |
100 (13.6) 634 (86.4) |
44 (44.0) 277 (43.7) |
9 (9.0) 98 (15.6) |
47 (47.0) 258 (40.7) |
3.39(2) 0.18 |
REFERENCES
1. World Health Organisation. Corona. World Health Organisation. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Pandemic. [Accessed on 7 April, 2021] available from:www.covid19india.org
2. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, G.O.I. COVID-19 vaccines operational guidelines. [Retrieved January 6, 2021] available from: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/COVID19VaccineOG111Chapter16.pdf
3. Meghna Sen. Covid vaccine: Govt will bear vaccination cost of frontline workers. mint e paper. [Accessed on 12 Jan 2021] available from: https://www.livemint.com/news/india/covid-vaccine-govt-will-bear-vaccination-cost-of-frontline-workers-says-amit-shah-11610363608889.html.
4. COVID-19: First Phase of Vaccination on January 16, Health Ministry Says. Science The WIRE. [Accessed on 12 Jan 2021] https://science.thewire.in/health/covid-19-vaccination-india-begin-january-16-covishield-covaxin/.
5. National Co-Win statistics, India. [Accessed on 8th April 2021] available from Dashboard.cowin.gov.in.
6. Kaur S, Singh A, Saini S, et al. Reporting adverse events of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 coronavirus vaccine (recombinant) among the vaccinated healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional survey. Indian J Med Res 155, 2022, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1221_21
7. “Why would you not get a vaccine against COVID-19?” Statista. (accessed 7 April 2021) Available from: https://www.statista.com./statistics/1114995/reasons-againstvaccination-against-COVID-19-in-russia/
8. Malik AA, McFadden SM, Elharake J, et al. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine 2020;26:100495. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495
9. Marcec R, Majta M, Likic R. Will vaccination refusal prolong the war on SARS-CoV-2? Postgrad Med J 2021;97(1145):143–149. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2020-138903
10. Paul E, Steptoe A, Fancourt D. Anti-vaccine attitudes and risk factors for not agreeing to vaccination against COVID-19 amongst 32,361 UK adults: implications for public health communications. MedRixv 2020;1–21. DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.21.20216218
11. Nzaji MK, Ngombe LK, Mwamba GN, et al. Acceptability of vaccination against COVID-19 among healthcare workers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Pragmat Obs Res 2020;11:103–109. DOI: 10.2147/POR.S271096
12. Khan S, Rahman CK, Harltha CV, et al. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: beliefs and barriers associated with vaccination among the general population in India. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 2020;8(Spl-1):S210–S218. DOI: 10.18006/2020.8(Spl-1-SARS-CoV-2).S210.S218
13. Domnich A, Cambiaggi M, Vasco A, et al. Attitudes and beliefs on influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a representative Italian survey. Vaccines 2020;8(4):711. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040711
14. Islam MS, Siddique AB, Akter R, et al. Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions towards COVID-19 vaccinations: a cross-sectional community survey in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health 2021;21(1):1851. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11880-9
15. Di Gennaro F, Murri R, Segala FV, et al. Attitudes towards vaccination among healthcare workers: results from a national survey in Italy. Viruses 2021;13(3):371. DOI: 10.3390/v13030371
16. Fisher KA, Bloomstone SJ, Walder J, et al. Attitudes toward a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a survey of U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med 2020;173(12):963–973. DOI: 10.7326/M20-3569
17. Cordina M, Lauri MA, Lauri J. Attitudes towards COVID 19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine. Pharm Pract 2021;19(1):2317. DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2317
18. Al-Qerem WA, Jarab AS. COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and its associated factors among a Middle Eastern population front. Front Public Health 2021;9:632914. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.632914
________________________
© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.