RESEARCH ARTICLE


https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10028-1644
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, Education and Research
Volume 58 | Issue 2 | Year 2024

Outcome of Isolated Eccentric Exercise Therapy in Sports Persons with Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy


Sarita Dhankhar1, Rajesh K Rohilla2, Pankaj K Sharma3, Deepshikha Beniwal4, Abha Singh5

1,2,4Department of Sports Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India

3Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhatinda, Punjab, India

5Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

Corresponding Author: Rajesh K Rohilla, Department of Sports Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India, Phone: +91 9812662814, e-mail: drrajeshrohilla@rediffmail.com

Received: 29 July 2023; Accepted: 20 August 2023; Published on: 05 July 2024

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the outcome of an isolated eccentric exercise (EE) program in sports persons with rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy.

Materials and methods: This prospective study enrolled 40 sports persons with a mean age of 26.4 years having shoulder pain with confirmed RC tendinopathy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) presenting to the sports injury care center, who were managed with isolated eccentric therapy and stretching exercises. These were managed by routine stretching exercises along with isolated eccentric home-based therapy for 3 months. Functional outcomes were measured as Constant-Murley score (CMS) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score while pain was measured as visual analog scale (VAS) score considered as primary outcomes. Other outcomes were measured as secondary outcomes including a range of movements of the shoulder and isometric abduction strength at 45° in the scapular plane by manual hand dynamometer [handheld dynamometer (HHD)] and shoulder range of motion (ROM) (forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation). All the parameters were evaluated at serial intervals including at presentation and at 3 and 6 months of follow-up visits.

Results: With respect to the decline in VAS ratings and DASH score, as well as the large increase in the CMS, there was a considerable improvement in pain and functional results. Mild degression of functional parameters was observed between 3 and 6 months but insignificant biostatistically. Overall muscle strength was improved significantly at the final follow-up than the first presentation.

Conclusion: Isolated EE therapy along with stretching is effective in the treatment of sports persons with RC tendinopathy.

How to cite this article: Dhankhar S, Rohilla RK, Sharma PK, et al. Outcome of Isolated Eccentric Exercise Therapy in Sports Persons with Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2024;58(2):69–73.

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None

Patient consent statement: The author(s) have obtained written informed consent from the patient for publication of the case report details and related images.

Keywords: Eccentric exercises, Rotator cuff, Tendinopathy, Shoulder, Sports persons

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of shoulder injuries in overhead sports varies from 5 to 36%, respectively.1-3 The concept of subacromial impingement syndrome was introduced by Neer in 1972 to describe a group of pathologies like tendinitis, bursitis, calcifications, and rotator cuff (RC) tears that produced pain when elevating the shoulder.4 Shoulder cuff or RC tendinopathy, which affects roughly 30% of the population, is thought to be the most typical cause of shoulder pain. People who engage in repetitive overhead activities, such as throwing sports like volleyball, baseball, badminton, cricket, and tennis, are more likely to get shoulder pain.5,6 RC tendinopathy has a complex etiology that includes both internal and extrinsic causes. Extrinsic mechanisms consist of both biomechanical and anatomical factors. Tendon morphology and performance are affected by intrinsic mechanisms.7 Conservative treatment is generally used for patients with RC tendinopathy as it can speed up the tendon’s healing by altering its metabolism as well as its structural and mechanical characteristics.8 Exercise therapy is commonly used as part of conservative treatment in patients with various types of tendinopathies.9,10 The eccentric exercise (EE) is now being increasingly reported in the literature as a specialized rehabilitative training method. The eccentric training targets the lengthening portion of the exercise and promotes a significantly greater increase in muscle strength. Because eccentric activities subject the tendon to a greater load than concentric movements, eccentric training is different from traditional training programs and generates a restorative effect after the production of muscle microruptures.11,12

As a result, relatively few research has looked into how well eccentric training works for people with RC tendinopathy. Therefore, the current study’s objective was to assess, through a long-term follow-up, the efficacy of isolated EE of the RC in sports persons with RC tendinopathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present prospective study included 40 sports persons with RC tendinopathy [confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] presenting to the sports injury care institute of North India and who were managed with isolated eccentric therapy. Prior to being enrolled in the trial, all individuals provided their written informed permission, and the Institutional Review Board gave their approval to the current study. Patients ranging from 18 to 45 years either having single-side subacromial discomfort of minimum for 12 weeks or having RC tendinopathy or its partial tear on MRI were included in the study. Patients who had clinical features of shoulder instability or complete RC tear or severe cervical radiculopathies or bursitis associated with type III acromion as per Bigliani criteria or having a history of a fractured shoulder or intervened by intraarticular steroid injection or any kind of surgery or having frozen shoulder and severe systemic diseases affecting rehabilitation of shoulder joint were excluded from the present study.

Intervention

All patients performed the isolated EEs (two types of exercises twice a day) combined with two types of stretching on a daily basis at home for 12 weeks. All patients also attended physiotherapy sessions twice in 1 week during the treatment period of 12 weeks. Physiotherapy sessions comprised of practicing the workout and accommodating the resistance load. Exercises were stopped after 3 months and thereafter, patients were allowed to accomplish their normal routine work. Patients engaged in two drills (Table 1). A supine lying EE for the external rotators is performed first (Fig. 1), with the patient’s hand holding an elastic band that is wrapped around the foot on the ipsilateral side. The shoulder was externally rotated and abducted by 90°. The patient was then instructed to bend one knee, externally rotate one shoulder, then, at a speed of 6–8 seconds per repeat, extend the knee and internally rotate the forearm. Second, patients engaged in a scapular plane empty-can abduction exercise (Fig. 2). Subjects passively raised their arm using a pulley until it was 90° abducted. They were then instructed to actively lower their arm at a speed of 6–8 seconds per repeat. Initially, both the exercises were performed with three sets of eight repetitions twice a day, daily. In order to alter the load, the number of repetitions was first increased (up to a maximum of 15 repetitions) and then the resistance of the dumbbell or elastic band was varied. Patients also completed stretches for the pectoralis minor muscle and the cross-body adduction stretch for the posterior shoulder muscles and capsular structures in addition to the eccentric strengthening activities. Both the stretching exercises were performed with one set of 10 repetitions (hold the stretch for 15 seconds) twice a day, daily.

Table 1: Eccentric exercise (EE) program
S. no. Exercises Frequency Repetition*sets Rest interval between sets Progression
1 Supine lying EE for external rotators with elastic band Twice a day, daily Eight repetitions (6–8 seconds per repetition) three sets 1 minute Resistance increased as tolerated
2 Empty can abduction exercise with pulley Twice a day, daily Eight repetitions (6–8 seconds per repetition) three sets 1 minute Resistance increased as tolerated
3 The cross-body adduction stretches Twice a day, daily 10 repetitions (hold the stretch for 15 seconds) one set 1 minute
4 Stretching exercises for the pectoralis minor muscle Twice a day, daily 10 repetitions (hold the stretch for 15 seconds) one set 5–10 seconds rest in between each stretch

Figs 1A and B: (A) Supine lying EE for external rotators with elastic band-starting position; (B) Supine lying EE for External rotators with elastic band–ending position

Figs 2A and B: (A) Empty can abduction exercise with pulley (right shoulder) starting position; (B) Empty can abduction exercise with pulley (right shoulder) ending position

Outcome Measures

Pain in the shoulder was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Two anchors are used to measure VAS along a straight 10 cm line. The right anchor.10 denotes “the most severe agony,” whereas the left (0) denotes “no pain”. The VAS is a valid tool for determining how much pain a patient perceives.13 Functional outcome was assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score. Pain, activities of daily life, range of movement, and strength are the four subscales of the CMS having 15, 20, 40, and 25 points, respectively, while 100 points reflected maximum and magnificent joint functions.14 The DASH score consists mainly of a 30-item disability/symptom scale, scored 0 (no disability) to 100 (maximum).15 Shoulder range of motion (ROM) and isometric abduction strength at 45° in the scapular plane served as secondary outcome measures (forward elevation, abduction, and external rotation). Using a handheld dynamometer (HHD), the shoulder abductors’ isometric strength was determined. The participants were instructed to abduct their shoulder to 45° in the scapular plane while the HHD was positioned distally on the humerus. It was necessary to do a 5-second maximum voluntary contraction three times in a row, with a 30-second rest period in between each repeat. Each trial’s peak force was recorded, and the average of three trials was utilized to analyze the results. Participants were instructed to move their arms to their fullest range while sitting in an active upright position without back support, with their feet on the ground, and a goniometer was used to quantify ROM. At the baseline, 12, and 24-weeks points, all measures were obtained.

Statistical Analysis

Data were collected on Microsoft spreadsheets and biostatic evaluation was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20 version software. Student t-tests and Chi-square tests were applied for evaluation and a p-value of <0.05 was accepted remarkable.

RESULTS

A total of 40 subjects (33 males and seven females) with a mean age of 26.4 years having shoulder cuff tendinopathy were included in the study. There were 12 athletes while wrestlers, kabaddi players, boxers, basketball players, and cricketers were 8, 6, 6, 4, and 4 in number, respectively. The right side was more commonly involved (60%) as compared to the left (40%). The average duration of symptoms was 8 weeks. MRI revealed 14 patients had a partial tear of supraspinatus while patients having supraspinatus tendinitis, supraspinatus tendinitis and Infraspinatus tendinitis, supraspinatus tendinitis and subscapularis tendinitis, supraspinatus tendinitis with a partial tear, partial tear subscapularis, partial tear supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendinitis, and subscapularis tendinosis were found in 11, six, three, and one patients, respectively. Overall mean ROM forward flexion at 0, 6, 12, and 24 weeks was 123.7, 140.8, 152.75, and 153°, respectively. The mean of ROM abduction at 0, 6, 12, and 24 weeks was 110.5, 133, 148.5, and 148.75°, respectively. The mean of ROM external rotation 0, 6, 12, and 24 weeks was 60.25, 71.8, 81, and 81°, respectively. There was a significant improvement in ROM values (forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation) from baseline to 24 weeks.

A significant decrease was seen in VAS scores at the 6th week (p-value = 0.0001) as compared to the 0, 12 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) as compared to the 6th week but no significant change was seen in VAS at the 24th week as compared to 12th week (p-value = 0.317). There was a significant increase in the CMS scores in the 6th week (p-value < 0.0001) as compared to 0, the 12th week (p-value < 0.0001) as compared to the 6th week but no significant change was seen in CMS in the 24th week as compared to 12th week (p-value = 0.545). DASH scores also showed a significant decrease in the values in the 6th week (p-value = 0.0001) as compared to 0, 12 weeks (p-value = 0.0001) as compared to the 6th week in both the groups but no significant change was seen in DASH at 24th week as compared to 12th week (p-value = 0.680). The EE program yielded significant improvement in the VAS, CMS, and DASH scores from baseline to 24 weeks (Table 2).

Table 2: Comparison of CMS and DASH scores at different time intervals
CMS DASH VAS
At 0 week
 Mean ± standard deviation 69.7 ± 14.55 21.12 ± 11.37 6.3 ± 1.45
 Median (25–75th percentile) 67.5 (64–83.25) 16.66 (13.122–27.915) 6 (5–7.25)
 Range 41–87 8.25–45 4–9
At 6th week
 Mean ± standard deviation 79 ± 13.43 16.78 ± 11.22 3.65 ± 1.69
 Median (25–75th percentile) 82 (74.75–89) 12.5 (9.16–22.708) 3 (2–4)
 Range 46–93 4.16–43.33 2–7
 Intra group p-value with respect to 0 week <0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
At 12th week
 Mean ± standard deviation 85.8 ± 12.04 12.45 ± 11.68 1.35 ± 1.39
 Median (25–75th percentile) 89.585–93 9.16 (3.952–16.872) 1 (0–2)
 Range 50–96 0.83–41.66 0–5
 Intragroup p-value with respect to 6 weeks <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0001
At 24th week
 Mean ± standard deviation 85.65 ± 12.33 12.41 ± 11.77 1.25 ± 1.45
 Median (25–75th percentile) 90 (86–93) 9.16 (3.952–17.702) 1 (0–2)
 Range 48–96 0.83–41.66 0–5
 Intragroup p-value with respect to 12 weeks 0.545 0.680 0.317

DISCUSSION

The major outcome of the current study is that isolated EE therapy significantly reduces pain and improves shoulder function in patients with RC tendinopathy (CMS and DASH score). Eccentric therapy significantly improves VAS, CMS, and DASH scores (between baseline and 6 weeks, and between 6 and 12 weeks), but there is no change between 12 weeks (the point at which the intervention ends) and 24 weeks of follow-up.

Very few studies have described the approach and results of EE therapy for RC tendinopathy in the literature. Nine patients with chronic, excruciating shoulder impingement syndrome were studied by Jonsson et al.,16 to determine the effects of eccentric training. An EE program consisting of three sets of 15 repetitions, twice daily for 12 weeks, was targeted at the supraspinatus and deltoid musculotendinous units. The authors found that after 12 weeks, five patients showed a considerably higher improvement in the CMS (pain and function) and a significantly lower VAS score. At the 52-week checkup, five patients had dropped off the waiting list for surgery because they were happy with their care. For 12 weeks, Bernhardsson et al.17 used RC eccentric strengthening exercises to treat 10 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. After 12 weeks, the authors found that all 10 participants had improved function and eight of the 10 subjects’ pain severity had decreased significantly. Western Ontario RC Index increased in seven participants, while Constant Score increased in nine cases. The authors came to the conclusion that individuals with subacromial impingement syndrome can benefit from a 12-week eccentric strengthening program that targets the RC and incorporates scapular control and the right movement pattern in order to reduce pain and improve function.

For six consecutive weeks, twice in 1 week on alternate days, Camargo et al.18 treated all the patients with bilateral isokinetic eccentric training at 600/seconds for shoulder abductors. A statistically notable upgrade was seen in the DASH score (p-value <0.05). In a larger sample of patients with impingement (n = 20), the authors demonstrated promising outcomes using an isokinetic eccentric training regimen.

In randomized controlled research, Holmgren et al.19 assessed the impact of eccentric RC strengthening exercises and concentric or eccentric scapula stabilizer exercises on the necessity of surgery in 102 patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Both the targeted exercise group and the control exercise group were randomly assigned to each subject. In the particular exercise along with manual mobilization, the group engaged in eccentric strengthening activities for the RC and concentric/EEs for the scapula stabilizers. The exercise program for the control group consisted of general neck and shoulder exercises. In comparison to the control exercise group that did not perform EEs, there was a statistically significant improvement in the CMS (pain and function) and DASH score in the EE group. The authors came to the conclusion that patients with persistent subacromial impingement syndrome respond better to particular exercises aimed at strengthening the RC, including eccentric activities for the RC and concentric/EEs for the scapular stabilizers. Additionally, they discovered that individuals with subacromial impingement syndrome who perform these exercises are less likely to require surgical intervention.

In 61 patients with subacromial pain, Maenhout et al.20 examined the benefits of combining 12 weeks of heavy load eccentric training with resisted internal and external rotation exercises in comparison to a control group. The authors came to the conclusion that traditional RC training alone was not better than traditional RC training with heavy load eccentric training for reducing pain (VAS) or enhancing function (shoulder pain and disability index). Although strong EE added more isometric strength, it had no greater benefit for reducing discomfort and enhancing shoulder function. In randomized controlled research, Dejaco et al.21 compared the effectiveness of isolated EE therapy and conventional exercise (CG) therapy in individuals with RC tendinopathy. A total of 36 RC tendinopathy patients were chosen and assigned to either the isolated EE group (n, 20) or the CG group (n, 16). Both groups underwent nine sessions of physiotherapy in addition to 12 weeks of home exercises. The authors found that after 26, 12 weeks EE program was no more successful at treating shoulder discomfort and function in those with RC tendinopathy than a normal exercise program for the RC and scapular muscles. Participants in the current study exhibited a considerable improvement in their ROM values compared to those in the study by Dejaco et al.21 This difference could be explained by the fact that in our study, pain-free ROM was examined in contrast to that of Dejaco et al.21 The present study’s VAS score reduction and CMS score improvement was marginally better than those of the EE group in Jonsson’s, Bernhardsson’s, and Dejaco’s study. The majority of this study’s findings were similar to those in the literature. After 12 weeks, there was no discernible improvement in the VAS, CMS, or DASH scores in the current trial. A 12-week exercise program may be too brief for this patient population, according to Dejaco’s study, where the EE group even displayed a minor, nonsignificant decline in CM score, and an increase in VAS score from 12 to 26 weeks. Because longer exercise regimens are more likely to result in tendon adaptation than shorter ones, more research on this topic is needed.

In this study, there is no control group in which all of the participants underwent the same workouts. Due to the lack of a control group, it is still possible that the condition’s natural maturation affected the outcomes. Another drawback of this study is that the person in charge of data collection was also responsible for treating study participants, which could have influenced the findings. The study’s strength, however, is that the diagnosis was supported by an MRI. Patients with RC tendinopathy confirmed on MRI have not been included in any solitary EE intervention trial published in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Patients with RC tendinopathy who receive isolated eccentric therapy have considerably improved shoulder function, less discomfort, and greater ROM. As a result, for athletes with RC tendinopathy, a 12-week isolated eccentric training program of the shoulder is a successful workout regimen. However, given that there was no change in outcome ratings from 12 to 24 weeks, the program may be too brief. Further information on the long-term efficacy of the aforementioned therapy in these individuals with shoulder injuries and RC tendinopathy can be obtained from a larger randomized prospective multicenter trial.

REFERENCES

1. Clarsen B, Bahr R, Andersson SH, et al. Reduced glenohumeral rotation, external rotation weakness and scapular dyskinesis are risk factors for shoulder injuries among elite male handball players: a prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 2014;48(17):1327–1333. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093702

2. Clarsen B, Bahr R, Heymans MW, et al. The prevalence and impact of overuse injuries in five N orwegian sports: application of a new surveillance method. Scandinav J Med Sci Sports 2015;25(3):323–330. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12223

3. Myklebust G, Hasslan L, Bahr R, et al. High prevalence of shoulder pain among elite Norwegian female handball players. Scandinav J Med Sci Sports 2013;23(3):288–294. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01398.x

4. Bigliani LU, Cofield RH, Flatow EL, et al. Charles Neer: on the giant of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18(3):333–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.033

5. Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? Br J Sports Med 2009;43(4):259–264. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052183

6. Abat F, Alfredson H, Cucchiarini M, et al. Current trends in tendinopathy: consensus of the ESSKA basic science committee. Part I: biology, biomechanics, anatomy and an exercise-based approach. J Experiment Orthopaed 2017;4(1):1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-017-0092-6

7. Seitz AL, McClure PW, Finucane S, et al. Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy: intrinsic, extrinsic, or both? Clin Biomechan 2011;26(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.001

8. Wang JH, Iosifidis MI, Fu FH. Biomechanical basis for tendinopathy. Clin Orthopaed Relate Res 2006;443:320–332. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000195927.81845.46

9. Habets B, Van Cingel RE. Eccentric exercise training in chronic mid-portion A chilles tendinopathy: A systematic review on different protocols. Scandinav J Med Sci Sports 2015;25(1):3–15. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12208

10. Malliaras P, Barton CJ, Reeves ND, et al. Achilles and patellar tendinopathy loading programmes: a systematic review comparing clinical outcomes and identifying potential mechanisms for effectiveness. Sports Med 2013;43(4):267–286. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-013-0019-z

11. Leadbetter WB. Cell-matrix response in tendon injury. Clin Sports Med 1992;11(3):533–578. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-5919(20)30507-X

12. Macías-Hernández SI, Pérez-Ramírez LE. Eccentric strength training for rotator cuff tendinopathies with subacromial impingement. Cir Cir 2015;83(1):74–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.circir.2015.04.029

13. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005;14(7):798–804. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x

14. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthopaed Relate Res 1987;1(214):160–164. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023

15. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). Am J Indust Med 1996;29(6):602–608. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L

16. Jonsson P, Wahlström P, Öhberg L, et al. Eccentric training in chronic painful impingement syndrome of the shoulder: results of a pilot study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14(1):76–81. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0611-8

17. Bernhardsson S, Klintberg IH, Wendt GK. Evaluation of an exercise concept focusing on eccentric strength training of the rotator cuff for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. Clin Rehabil 2011;25(1):69–78. DOI: 10.1177/0269215510376005

18. Camargo PR, Avila MA, Alburquerque-Sendín F, et al. Eccentric training for shoulder abductors improves pain, function and isokinetic performance in subjects with shoulder impingement syndrome: a case series. Brazil J Physic Ther 2012;16(1):74–83. DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552012000100013

19. Holmgren T, Hallgren HB, Öberg B, et al. Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. BMJ 2012;344:e787. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e787

20. Maenhout AG, Mahieu NN, De Muynck M, et al. Does adding heavy load eccentric training to rehabilitation of patients with unilateral subacromial impingement result in better outcome? A randomized, clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscop 2013;21(5):1158–1167. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2012-8

21. Dejaco B, Habets B, van Loon C, et al. Eccentric versus conventional exercise therapy in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized, single blinded, clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscop 2017;25(7):2051–2059. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4223-x

________________________
© The Author(s). 2024 Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.